This Is Class War
AIThis post was created with the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI).

TL;DR

Before you orderOffer from Amazon

Get art and craft supplies delivered free with Prime

  • Fast, free delivery on millions of items
  • Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
  • Member-only deals all year
Start your free Prime trial Free trial for eligible customers · Cancel anytime
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

Hyperallergic editor-in-chief Hakim Bishara’s “This Is Class War” is a first-person satirical column, not a report of a newly announced event. It juxtaposes coverage of student protests in France with elite art-world fundraising and the narrator’s daydream about winning the lottery, ending on graffiti reading “Class War.”

Hyperallergic editor-in-chief Hakim Bishara uses his column “This Is Class War” to contrast student protests in France with conspicuous wealth in the art world, framing the piece as a first-person satire of class inequality rather than a straight account of a single protest or museum decision, a theme also explored in The War On Art. The column moves between the narrator’s commute, a benefit dinner and reports of unrest in Paris before ending with the sight of “Class War” graffiti and a decision to buy a lottery ticket.

The column opens on a subway ride from Brooklyn to Manhattan, where the narrator sees an advertisement for Les Misérables while following social-media coverage of protests in France. Bishara describes that feed as emphasizing looting and vandalism and says it presents a violent picture of protests he characterizes as largely peaceful, echoing the scrutiny of conflict narratives in artists’ reflections on the “War on Terror.” The source material does not independently establish the scale or character of the demonstrations; those descriptions are part of the column’s account.

At a fundraising dinner for an art residency held in a former bank, the narrator watches guests bid and a donation ticker climb. The scene is set against an inscription about saving money and “a competence for the future.” Bishara uses the contrast between high-value donations and the narrator’s imagined financial insecurity to question how wealth and cultural status operate in the art world, a tension also present in artists’ protest against the Iran war.

The narrative then turns to a $650 million Powerball jackpot advertised at a bodega. The narrator fantasizes about winning and buying art, before noticing a barista trying to purchase a ticket to a film about Elizabeth Holmes. On the trip home, the narrator misses a stop while reading about Kazimir Malevich, gets off in an impoverished neighborhood and sees “Class War” scrawled on a residential building. The column ends with the narrator buying a lottery ticket. These are scenes and reflections presented by the author, not independently verified reporting about the people or places described.

At a glance
reportWhen: Published in a Hyperallergic newsletter…
The developmentHyperallergic published Hakim Bishara’s first-person column “This Is Class War,” which uses Paris protests and scenes of art-world wealth to satirize class inequality.

Art Wealth Meets Protest Coverage

The column’s central point is the contrast between economic insecurity and elite cultural wealth. Its narrator moves from news about demonstrators protesting education conditions and living costs to an art-world benefit where donors compete to give large sums. The juxtaposition asks readers to notice whose financial concerns receive attention and how cultural institutions relate to wealth.

That framing also bears on how protest is represented. Bishara describes a social-media feed focused on property damage and violence, while presenting the wider demonstrations as largely peaceful. Because the source is a satirical column rather than a reported survey of coverage, it offers the author’s critique, not evidence that all media outlets depicted the protests in the same way.

The lottery ending gives the satire a personal dimension: the narrator imagines that access to wealth could make art collecting and philanthropy possible, while the graffiti supplies a blunt counterpoint. The piece does not propose a policy response or report a change in the art market. Its significance lies in using a familiar urban commute to connect class, protest and cultural patronage.

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

The Paris Protests in the Column

The supplied Hyperallergic material places the column alongside coverage of student demonstrations in Paris. That coverage describes protests over police violence, under-resourced schools and rising living costs, and reports that demonstrators from the École du Louvre blocked the museum’s main entrance as nationwide protests approached the one-month mark. These details provide the political setting for Bishara’s references to unrest, but they are separate items in the newsletter.

The source also says Art Basel Paris closed early ahead of planned protests and intended to remove outdoor sculptures from Winston Churchill Avenue. It reports that several Paris museums, including the Louvre, the Musée d’Orsay, the Musée de l’Orangerie and the Musée National Picasso, would be closed that day. The column’s own passage says the Louvre closed to protect its collections and describes the art-world class as fleeing the city. Those formulations should be read as the author’s satirical characterization, not as a full account of each institution’s reasoning.

The supplied text does not identify the exact date of the events or provide statements from the museums, fair organizers, demonstrators or police. It supports a limited chronology: protests had been ongoing, Art Basel Paris closed early ahead of further planned demonstrations, and the column uses that moment to draw a comparison with wealth and cultural institutions.

““Loot a little and they throw you in jail; loot a lot and they let you open a museum.””

— Hakim Bishara, Hyperallergic editor-in-chief

Details the Source Does Not Establish

The supplied material does not give a publication date for the column or a precise date for the scenes it describes. It also does not identify the benefit dinner, the art residency, the building, the bodega or the theater, so those details cannot be independently checked from the text provided.

The account of the protests is presented through the author’s perspective and newsletter context. The source does not provide protester, police or museum statements, independent crowd estimates, or a full explanation for each closure. It is also unclear from the supplied material whether every event in the first-person narrative is literal, compressed or stylized. The piece is labeled and written as satire, so its scenes should not be treated as a comprehensive factual record.

No Further Action Reported

The supplied source reports no follow-up action tied to the column itself. It does not announce a new investigation, institutional response or change in policy. Readers seeking the status of the French demonstrations or the museum and fair closures would need reporting beyond this satirical essay, since the source offers no later update or outcome.

For the article’s central argument, the next development is interpretive rather than procedural: the column leaves readers with its contrast between cultural philanthropy and economic precarity, without claiming that the lottery fantasy or graffiti resolves that divide.

Key Questions

What is “This Is Class War”?

It is a first-person satirical column by Hakim Bishara, identified in the source as Hyperallergic’s editor-in-chief. It links scenes of art-world fundraising with the author’s account of student protests in France.

Does the piece report a new protest or museum closure?

No. The column refers to protests and closures described in the newsletter, but the article itself is not an announcement of a new event. The supplied material does not provide a fresh update on their status.

What is the column criticizing?

Bishara contrasts wealth and cultural patronage with financial insecurity, and questions how protests are portrayed. These are the author’s arguments and satire, not independently verified findings about the art world or media coverage.

Is the narrator’s story independently verified?

The source presents a first-person narrative but does not offer corroboration for its individual scenes. The column should be read as satirical commentary, not as a fully documented account of each event it depicts.

Source: rss

You May Also Like

The Art And Beauty Of Blade Runner

Exploring the art, design, and cultural impact of Blade Runner, highlighting its enduring visual style and influence in sci-fi cinema.

Collin van der Sluijs’ ‘Wanderland’ Imagines a Vast Ecosystem Encompass the Momentous and Mundane

Artist Collin van der Sluijs’ ‘Wanderland’ explores a sprawling ecosystem that blends the mundane and the extraordinary, expanding the concept of immersive art.

Scroll-Driven Animation: A Look Inside “LZ-42 Werft — Cyanotype Airship Works” (FABLE/175)

AIThis post was created with the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI).“LZ-42 Werft…

Art Books On Needles And Threads

Hyperallergic’s books newsletter recommends titles on quilting, embroidery, weaving and fiber art, alongside criticism on John Berger and other artists.